http://www.freemoviewonderland.com/movie-questions/is-the-movie-mary-poppins-designed-simply-to-give-americans-a-view-of-british-society-or-to-satirize-it/ All the best movies at free movie wonderland ! Sun, 26 Dec 2010 23:40:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://www.freemoviewonderland.com/movie-questions/is-the-movie-mary-poppins-designed-simply-to-give-americans-a-view-of-british-society-or-to-satirize-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1280 Rob Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:07:07 +0000 http://www.freemoviewonderland.com/movie-questions/is-the-movie-mary-poppins-designed-simply-to-give-americans-a-view-of-british-society-or-to-satirize-it/#comment-1280 Well... given that EVERYONE in the movie was British except the freaky parlor guy, I'd say it was a British movie that got popular in America. Interesting theory, if I'm wrong, though. And the first thing for the details. Well… given that EVERYONE in the movie was British except the freaky parlor guy, I’d say it was a British movie that got popular in America. Interesting theory, if I’m wrong, though.
And the first thing for the details.

]]> http://www.freemoviewonderland.com/movie-questions/is-the-movie-mary-poppins-designed-simply-to-give-americans-a-view-of-british-society-or-to-satirize-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1279 Regina Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:42:40 +0000 http://www.freemoviewonderland.com/movie-questions/is-the-movie-mary-poppins-designed-simply-to-give-americans-a-view-of-british-society-or-to-satirize-it/#comment-1279 Personally, I'd say the simple answer to your query is that you're over thinking a simple, family-oriented film. The character of the mother's role, though small in comparison to the object of the story, typifies the common practice of early England, that of every family of any real means employing a nanny and being somewhat hands-off in the rearing of their offspring. I don't know that it was hypocritical as much as it was selfish, the mother devoting little time to her children, yet parading around bellowing about equal rights for women. Personally, I’d say the simple answer to your query is that you’re over thinking a simple, family-oriented film. The character of the mother’s role, though small in comparison to the object of the story, typifies the common practice of early England, that of every family of any real means employing a nanny and being somewhat hands-off in the rearing of their offspring. I don’t know that it was hypocritical as much as it was selfish, the mother devoting little time to her children, yet parading around bellowing about equal rights for women.

]]>